Give a bully an opening and they don't disappoint. A bully will always abuse their power to twist and distort and to punish those they feel are not worthy of their respect. The Seattle PI, the LA Times, and of course the NY Times continue to polish their oppression to perfection. The Libby verdict is a good example. Vice President Chaney's chief of staff is found guilty of telling a lie when he said that he didn't spread the name of a Bush critic's wife. Prosecutor Fitzgerald tells all that this lie obstructed justice and disrespected the system. Maybe or maybe not. But that's Libby's problem.
The truth is that a guy's wife got him sent to Niger and when he lied about what he found, the administration rightly pointed to his wife to answer why on earth a Bush hater had been sent on a sensitive mission.
The Seattle PI among many other media bullies use the straw man theory of oppression not by answering the president but by answering their own feelings. The bullies accuse that there's no proof that Iraq bought uranium in Niger. But then the president didn't say they did. He said and the British agree that Iraq sought uranium in Africa. And guess what? Wilson, the liar according to the Washington Post, agrees.
Bottom line again is an abuse of the media's constitutional protections and privileges. Without the protections, we the people could take the PI and other bullies to court by proving they lie and misrepresent facts. Not just about their hate for President Bush. But also in defense of other government abuses and failures. Education? Lies, lies lies. Economy? Lies, lies, lies. Environment? Lies, lies, lies. Time has come to make the media accountable.
Thursday, March 8, 2007
Tuesday, March 6, 2007
Media on Trial Today!
Today's Libbey jury verdict tells us little about facts and much more about political wars. It's my assertion that those left of center use the system to punish their enemies. Seems to me that they criminalize politics to send a clear message that resistance is futile. History is full of progressive regimes that used the system to criminally punish their political foes. The best are the Soviets, the Fascists, other communist and socialist despots and tyrants, and the Democrats.
As the media now spins the Libbey conviction we may want to return to the cause of all this hysteria. President Bush said in his State of the Union Address that Iraq had sought to buy uranium in Africa. After the start of the Iraq invasion, a guy named Wilson began to provide details of what he called his fact finding mission to Niger on behalf of the CIA and the Vice President. This culminated with a Wilson written NY Times OPED piece firmly stating that he was sent to Niger and reported back to the CIA who then told the Vice President that he found no evidence that the Iraqis attempted to buy uranium.
Facts uncovered by the House Intelligence Committee and a statement by the CIA say that Wilson did report that Iraq "businessmen" attempted to establish a buying relationship. But found no evidence that a purchase was made. Further facts uncovered say that Wilson got the trip by suggestion of his wife who was now on the outs with the CIA. Facts tell us that she was a central part of the "asleep at the switch" during proliferation of nuclear technology to Libya, North Korea, and Iran. Our CIA knew nothing when the French and English knew all.
When accused of lying and of getting his trip due to his wife, Wilson and Plame told the media a series of lies. Today every major Democrat is repeating those factually refuted lies with the assistance of the psychotic media that actually believes that Wilson discredited the president's speech. I personally saw a couple left of center talking heads today get angry when their assertion that Bush lied was challenged by the facts. Hysteria or psychosis? You decide.
How does the "Scooter" fit into this? He was responsible for getting the facts out. And one of the facts was an answer to every reporter's curiosity why a guy like Wilson was sent? And the answer is: Because his wife got him the trip! Now "Scooter" didn't leak that, it was Secretary Powell's partner Armatadge who was anti-war but still felt it was reasonable to expose Wilson and his wife.
As the media now spins the Libbey conviction we may want to return to the cause of all this hysteria. President Bush said in his State of the Union Address that Iraq had sought to buy uranium in Africa. After the start of the Iraq invasion, a guy named Wilson began to provide details of what he called his fact finding mission to Niger on behalf of the CIA and the Vice President. This culminated with a Wilson written NY Times OPED piece firmly stating that he was sent to Niger and reported back to the CIA who then told the Vice President that he found no evidence that the Iraqis attempted to buy uranium.
Facts uncovered by the House Intelligence Committee and a statement by the CIA say that Wilson did report that Iraq "businessmen" attempted to establish a buying relationship. But found no evidence that a purchase was made. Further facts uncovered say that Wilson got the trip by suggestion of his wife who was now on the outs with the CIA. Facts tell us that she was a central part of the "asleep at the switch" during proliferation of nuclear technology to Libya, North Korea, and Iran. Our CIA knew nothing when the French and English knew all.
When accused of lying and of getting his trip due to his wife, Wilson and Plame told the media a series of lies. Today every major Democrat is repeating those factually refuted lies with the assistance of the psychotic media that actually believes that Wilson discredited the president's speech. I personally saw a couple left of center talking heads today get angry when their assertion that Bush lied was challenged by the facts. Hysteria or psychosis? You decide.
How does the "Scooter" fit into this? He was responsible for getting the facts out. And one of the facts was an answer to every reporter's curiosity why a guy like Wilson was sent? And the answer is: Because his wife got him the trip! Now "Scooter" didn't leak that, it was Secretary Powell's partner Armatadge who was anti-war but still felt it was reasonable to expose Wilson and his wife.
Monday, March 5, 2007
Progressive Values!
Progressive values are on display daily, yet the liberal media selects to snooze past most of this radical hate speech. A great comparison is on display today. The "Media" is buzzing about Ann Coulter's colorful description of Edwards along with a satirical comment about liberal values when she said that she could describe Edwards but is afraid of being sent to rehab for saying "Fagot." We all know that the "F" word is considered much worse by the loony left, than even the "N" word. Both letters are owned by the radical-left political correctness squad. So Coulter, more a comedian in the line of Bill Maher, John Kerry, and others, than a political figure is the top of the news. Even Hillarybob and Barrack Osama and the alphabet media are screeching.
It gets better. A liberal blog writes in the same week that it's a disappointment that Vice President Chaney survived a bombing in Pakistan on a visit. So not to be outdone, Maher discusses this opinion with the House's self-labeling "F" man, Rep. Barney Frank. While Frank showed some sensitivity, Maher grabs the baton by saying that: "It's a fact that if Chaney were (dead) no long in power, lives would be saved." Maher is unapologetic about his Jihad death sentence for Chaney. That's OK some say because after all he is a comedian.
So a reasonable person might ask why Maher's belief is not hate speech? He is telling his audience that he feels that a dead vice president is better than a live one. Ann Coulter on the other hand is making fun of Edwards by referencing his "pretty boy" looks and often effeminate behavior. She doesn't attack his fake populist positions. Edwards in an easy poster-boy for owner-oppressor because he paid his workers in his law firm $20 bucks an hour or so while he pocketed as much as $10,000 an hour for himself. That's 500 times the pay of his workers.
Yet, the progressive-value-media finds Coulter in violation of hate speech while disregarding Maher. A reasonable person would say they are protecting Edwards, one of their own, while they hate Coulter, the enemy. It's no wonder that these same values are the foundation for the left's often confused despot and tyrant hugging. These values say that Hugo Chavez, Venezuela's despot socialist and North Korea's mass murder Kim Jung Ill are being bullied by President Bush who they say is the problem. As long as values and morals and ethics are defined politically, the radical left will continue to embrace international criminals in their effort to punish their political enemies. These psychos need more meds before they can rise to adult policy making.
It gets better. A liberal blog writes in the same week that it's a disappointment that Vice President Chaney survived a bombing in Pakistan on a visit. So not to be outdone, Maher discusses this opinion with the House's self-labeling "F" man, Rep. Barney Frank. While Frank showed some sensitivity, Maher grabs the baton by saying that: "It's a fact that if Chaney were (dead) no long in power, lives would be saved." Maher is unapologetic about his Jihad death sentence for Chaney. That's OK some say because after all he is a comedian.
So a reasonable person might ask why Maher's belief is not hate speech? He is telling his audience that he feels that a dead vice president is better than a live one. Ann Coulter on the other hand is making fun of Edwards by referencing his "pretty boy" looks and often effeminate behavior. She doesn't attack his fake populist positions. Edwards in an easy poster-boy for owner-oppressor because he paid his workers in his law firm $20 bucks an hour or so while he pocketed as much as $10,000 an hour for himself. That's 500 times the pay of his workers.
Yet, the progressive-value-media finds Coulter in violation of hate speech while disregarding Maher. A reasonable person would say they are protecting Edwards, one of their own, while they hate Coulter, the enemy. It's no wonder that these same values are the foundation for the left's often confused despot and tyrant hugging. These values say that Hugo Chavez, Venezuela's despot socialist and North Korea's mass murder Kim Jung Ill are being bullied by President Bush who they say is the problem. As long as values and morals and ethics are defined politically, the radical left will continue to embrace international criminals in their effort to punish their political enemies. These psychos need more meds before they can rise to adult policy making.
Tuesday, February 27, 2007
Hysteria or Just Plain Dishonesty?
The out-of-control and beyond accountability media is stretching it's oppression to new heights. Today's Al, the portly world savior, Oscar for Docu-Fiction goes to the NY Times OPED page where hysteria and even psychotic behavior is celebrated.
Today's effort is to paint Canada's Supremes as an enlightened and liberal group of concerned world citizens that respect the helpless and downtrodden. While they contrast that to our Supremes and the Bush Administration that are in their view: Icky! Problem with these ad hominem attacks is that they are not based on facts. Worse is that they convict their political opponents without due process.
Seems that the evidence says and many feel that the NY Times and most Democrats believe due process is for foreign despots, tyrants, illegal aliens and Mexican drug dealers. Of course extra special due process is critical for local murderers and rapists and child killers.
Seems to me that a reasonable person might conclude that due process is not about getting to the truth but is a contrived piece of work that attempts to judge if a murderer was fairly investigated and convicted.
The Times begins its attack by convicting the President by saying: "like President Bush’s illegal wiretapping of international calls and e-mail." Truth is that there is no factual account of illegal email snooping while there is debate over the terror-surveillance-program that now is amended. Facts seldom stand in the way of hysterics and never stands in the way of psychotics. You decide which drives that sentence. It gets better.
The Times feels that our courts lack judicial legitimacy because they held that: "Congress could deny inmates of the Guantánamo Bay detention camp the ancient right to challenge their confinement in (federal) court. The 2006 military tribunals law revoked that right for a select group who had been designated “illegal enemy combatants” without a semblance of judicial process." Yes, the ANCIENT RIGHT argument. Remember that one? Actually no, there is no ANCIENT RIGHT argument for spies and illegal combatants. And the lack of a "semblance of judicial process" means that they can't get off due to a technicality.
Fact is that persons that murder while hiding among civilians have for all time been executed ON THE SPOT. And maybe that is the way we should respond too. Hang em high. While uniformed soldiers get some protections, those that murder women and children are defended by the hysterical left as if they are school children dragged from class for just being different. The truth would set these psychos free, but their mental prison is actually the place they aspire to inhabit. Go Figure?
Today's effort is to paint Canada's Supremes as an enlightened and liberal group of concerned world citizens that respect the helpless and downtrodden. While they contrast that to our Supremes and the Bush Administration that are in their view: Icky! Problem with these ad hominem attacks is that they are not based on facts. Worse is that they convict their political opponents without due process.
Seems that the evidence says and many feel that the NY Times and most Democrats believe due process is for foreign despots, tyrants, illegal aliens and Mexican drug dealers. Of course extra special due process is critical for local murderers and rapists and child killers.
Seems to me that a reasonable person might conclude that due process is not about getting to the truth but is a contrived piece of work that attempts to judge if a murderer was fairly investigated and convicted.
The Times begins its attack by convicting the President by saying: "like President Bush’s illegal wiretapping of international calls and e-mail." Truth is that there is no factual account of illegal email snooping while there is debate over the terror-surveillance-program that now is amended. Facts seldom stand in the way of hysterics and never stands in the way of psychotics. You decide which drives that sentence. It gets better.
The Times feels that our courts lack judicial legitimacy because they held that: "Congress could deny inmates of the Guantánamo Bay detention camp the ancient right to challenge their confinement in (federal) court. The 2006 military tribunals law revoked that right for a select group who had been designated “illegal enemy combatants” without a semblance of judicial process." Yes, the ANCIENT RIGHT argument. Remember that one? Actually no, there is no ANCIENT RIGHT argument for spies and illegal combatants. And the lack of a "semblance of judicial process" means that they can't get off due to a technicality.
Fact is that persons that murder while hiding among civilians have for all time been executed ON THE SPOT. And maybe that is the way we should respond too. Hang em high. While uniformed soldiers get some protections, those that murder women and children are defended by the hysterical left as if they are school children dragged from class for just being different. The truth would set these psychos free, but their mental prison is actually the place they aspire to inhabit. Go Figure?
Thursday, February 1, 2007
Media Psychosis Continues!
Ah, the '08 presidential campaign is raging. The contest is not for the top but it's a race to the bottom. And Joe, the plagerer Biden doesn't disappoint. Yesterday he tells us that Barack Obama is the "new" African American with traits like "clean cut" appearance and most importantly differentiating him from other African Americans, he's "mainstream" and "articulate." This is how Joe sees it. This is how Joe feels it. And this is Joe Biden reality.
Seems that a wave of psychosis is sweeping left of center thinkers. I once thought is was the beltway that caused this malady. No, it's inbreeding due to lack of diversity. Liberals indoctrinate babies with psychotic and hysterical accounts of the world and of this "soooo despotic America." It's John, the Frenchie, Kerry that calls us all pariahs. Not Fidel the mass murderer; not Kim Jung Ill who's family has killed about 10 million; not Saddam who killed about 2 million; not other secular socialists that killed over 200 million in the 20th century; just the Republican America and these 50 or 60 million "fools" that vote for them.
A popular definition of psychosis is: "a generic psychiatric term for a mental state in which thought and perception are severely impaired. Persons experiencing a psychotic episode may experience hallucinations, hold delusional beliefs (e.g., grandiose or paranoid delusions), demonstrate personality changes and exhibit disorganized thinking. This is often accompanied by lack of insight into the unusual or bizarre nature of such behaviour, difficulties with social interaction and impairments in carrying out the activities of daily living. A psychotic episode is often described as involving a "loss of contact with reality". Is there ever a better definition of liberals and the media???????
Biden, Kerry, and most other psychotic left thinkers confuse reality with the way they see the world, America, and others. Biden KNOWS that HE can give power to African Americans which THEY can't earn on their own (Biden believes because we are all racists). I call that a racist belief. Biden probably believes he's right because he feels giving power is politics, not racially motivated. That dovetails with education and other programs where children of color are dismissed as unable to learn due to society and thus actually are denied challenges that will open hope and opportunity through merit rather than gifts from racists and apologists.
Seems that a wave of psychosis is sweeping left of center thinkers. I once thought is was the beltway that caused this malady. No, it's inbreeding due to lack of diversity. Liberals indoctrinate babies with psychotic and hysterical accounts of the world and of this "soooo despotic America." It's John, the Frenchie, Kerry that calls us all pariahs. Not Fidel the mass murderer; not Kim Jung Ill who's family has killed about 10 million; not Saddam who killed about 2 million; not other secular socialists that killed over 200 million in the 20th century; just the Republican America and these 50 or 60 million "fools" that vote for them.
A popular definition of psychosis is: "a generic psychiatric term for a mental state in which thought and perception are severely impaired. Persons experiencing a psychotic episode may experience hallucinations, hold delusional beliefs (e.g., grandiose or paranoid delusions), demonstrate personality changes and exhibit disorganized thinking. This is often accompanied by lack of insight into the unusual or bizarre nature of such behaviour, difficulties with social interaction and impairments in carrying out the activities of daily living. A psychotic episode is often described as involving a "loss of contact with reality". Is there ever a better definition of liberals and the media???????
Biden, Kerry, and most other psychotic left thinkers confuse reality with the way they see the world, America, and others. Biden KNOWS that HE can give power to African Americans which THEY can't earn on their own (Biden believes because we are all racists). I call that a racist belief. Biden probably believes he's right because he feels giving power is politics, not racially motivated. That dovetails with education and other programs where children of color are dismissed as unable to learn due to society and thus actually are denied challenges that will open hope and opportunity through merit rather than gifts from racists and apologists.
Tuesday, January 30, 2007
Are Most Journalists Insane?
The election of G.W. Bush after two terms of Billy Clinton seems to have shaken the news media to it's shallow and plastic roots. We've seen over 6 years of dishonesty, exaggeration, hate, envy, and often hysterical, and even psychotic behavior among the liberal media elite. Yes, some activities and some events are open to perceptions or even interpretations, but facts are facts.
I once believed that the poor and uneducated were unable to discern facts from impressions and feelings. We all saw the OJ jury celebrate because they got it right. Yet any person educated beyond the 8th grade knew OJ "done it." Some said that it was easier for the jury to believe in OJ's innocence because she, his now dead ex-wife, "had it cummin." And they felt that African American felons are rousted more than Caucasian felons.
Another example was the arrival of Christopher Columbus in the New World. Historians say that the natives couldn't see the ships when they anchored because they didn't have any idea what ships were. They therefore found new arrivals on their beaches without any idea how that might have happened. And so it is for the liberal media ignorants.
Today, the Washington Post, the less psychotic media outlet among the far left extreme media says again that Joe Wilson went to Niger to explore if Saddam's Iraq "attempted to secure yellow cake uranium from Niger." Today's Post reporters Amy Goldstein and Carol Leonning write: "A few months after the Iraq war began, Wilson publicly criticized President Bush, saying the president had tried to justify the war by including in a State of the Union address "twisted" intelligence from a CIA-sponsored trip to Africa in which Wilson had concluded there was no basis to reports that Iraq had tried to buy uranium to make nuclear weapons from the nation of Niger."
Truth is that the Congressional Committee on Intelligence that reviewed Wilson's report to the CIA on his return, and the CIA have stated unequivocally that: Wilson found evidence that Iraqi "businessmen" had contacted Niger uranium officials to discuss "business relations" which Wilson is quoted as interpreting to mean: "THEY TRIED." Wilson goes on the say that he: "found no real evidence that they succeeded." Further, now that we know that Saddam had bought the French with billions through "Oil for Food and Medicine," it's less likely that the French denied Iraq's request. Why? The French control Niger's uranium.
So with all these facts everywhere in the cyber and real world, why do today's Washington Post reporters repeat the lie? Because they can't see it. They are hysterical over this president's choice to go to war and they MUST tell the people how wrong and illegal and criminal it is. As the women on OJ's jury, these two women strut their stuff believing they see the truth. Fact's don't matter.
The criminal part of this story is that the Post editors KNOW that these women are lying. Yet they too believe that the "company" line must be maintained or the people will again embrace the "dangerous" GW Bush. This is why the special constitutional protections for these loons must be ended today!
I once believed that the poor and uneducated were unable to discern facts from impressions and feelings. We all saw the OJ jury celebrate because they got it right. Yet any person educated beyond the 8th grade knew OJ "done it." Some said that it was easier for the jury to believe in OJ's innocence because she, his now dead ex-wife, "had it cummin." And they felt that African American felons are rousted more than Caucasian felons.
Another example was the arrival of Christopher Columbus in the New World. Historians say that the natives couldn't see the ships when they anchored because they didn't have any idea what ships were. They therefore found new arrivals on their beaches without any idea how that might have happened. And so it is for the liberal media ignorants.
Today, the Washington Post, the less psychotic media outlet among the far left extreme media says again that Joe Wilson went to Niger to explore if Saddam's Iraq "attempted to secure yellow cake uranium from Niger." Today's Post reporters Amy Goldstein and Carol Leonning write: "A few months after the Iraq war began, Wilson publicly criticized President Bush, saying the president had tried to justify the war by including in a State of the Union address "twisted" intelligence from a CIA-sponsored trip to Africa in which Wilson had concluded there was no basis to reports that Iraq had tried to buy uranium to make nuclear weapons from the nation of Niger."
Truth is that the Congressional Committee on Intelligence that reviewed Wilson's report to the CIA on his return, and the CIA have stated unequivocally that: Wilson found evidence that Iraqi "businessmen" had contacted Niger uranium officials to discuss "business relations" which Wilson is quoted as interpreting to mean: "THEY TRIED." Wilson goes on the say that he: "found no real evidence that they succeeded." Further, now that we know that Saddam had bought the French with billions through "Oil for Food and Medicine," it's less likely that the French denied Iraq's request. Why? The French control Niger's uranium.
So with all these facts everywhere in the cyber and real world, why do today's Washington Post reporters repeat the lie? Because they can't see it. They are hysterical over this president's choice to go to war and they MUST tell the people how wrong and illegal and criminal it is. As the women on OJ's jury, these two women strut their stuff believing they see the truth. Fact's don't matter.
The criminal part of this story is that the Post editors KNOW that these women are lying. Yet they too believe that the "company" line must be maintained or the people will again embrace the "dangerous" GW Bush. This is why the special constitutional protections for these loons must be ended today!
Wednesday, January 24, 2007
Facts are Irrelevant
The election is now so 2006 and today's challenges demand resolution. America's voters sent a clearly ambiguous message that America and the world are not to their liking. Problem for our leaders is what is it about America and the world that the people don't like?
It's not easy to read others' minds. Yet some believe they can or they believe that they must demand that other's do as they say. This is ground zero for the titanic struggle now emerging in America's politics. Some demand that the rest respect their demands. Others say no because America guarantees that each man, woman, and child is blessed with God given self determination. Sounds pretty Judeo-Christian to me. The ones that demand that we demure to them sound like despot oppressors to me.
This plays into the new left wing secular religious march toward diminishing consumer economics. This is the crowd that propped up the Soviets; this is the crowd that still loves Cuba; thisis the crowd that says pay North Korea and Cuba to keep them in line; this is the crowd that feels that America should step back from prosperity to follow the Europeans into mediocrity.
The new Joker in the deck is that many Democrats and most if not all liberals see and hear what they believe. They don't see or hear facts and truth. They twist it and mold it to fit their own psychotic and hysterical views of the world. In fact, when we hire, we should exclude these psychos and perverts.
And that's why the media must be held accountable for their six years of Bush hate and envy. Six years of dishonesty and of personal attacks. Six years of fear mongering and abuse. This media deserves to loose it's constitutional protections.
.
It's not easy to read others' minds. Yet some believe they can or they believe that they must demand that other's do as they say. This is ground zero for the titanic struggle now emerging in America's politics. Some demand that the rest respect their demands. Others say no because America guarantees that each man, woman, and child is blessed with God given self determination. Sounds pretty Judeo-Christian to me. The ones that demand that we demure to them sound like despot oppressors to me.
This plays into the new left wing secular religious march toward diminishing consumer economics. This is the crowd that propped up the Soviets; this is the crowd that still loves Cuba; thisis the crowd that says pay North Korea and Cuba to keep them in line; this is the crowd that feels that America should step back from prosperity to follow the Europeans into mediocrity.
The new Joker in the deck is that many Democrats and most if not all liberals see and hear what they believe. They don't see or hear facts and truth. They twist it and mold it to fit their own psychotic and hysterical views of the world. In fact, when we hire, we should exclude these psychos and perverts.
And that's why the media must be held accountable for their six years of Bush hate and envy. Six years of dishonesty and of personal attacks. Six years of fear mongering and abuse. This media deserves to loose it's constitutional protections.
.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)