Hysteria or Just Plain Dishonesty?

The out-of-control and beyond accountability media is stretching it's oppression to new heights. Today's Al, the portly world savior, Oscar for Docu-Fiction goes to the NY Times OPED page where hysteria and even psychotic behavior is celebrated.

Today's effort is to paint Canada's Supremes as an enlightened and liberal group of concerned world citizens that respect the helpless and downtrodden. While they contrast that to our Supremes and the Bush Administration that are in their view: Icky! Problem with these ad hominem attacks is that they are not based on facts. Worse is that they convict their political opponents without due process.

Seems that the evidence says and many feel that the NY Times and most Democrats believe due process is for foreign despots, tyrants, illegal aliens and Mexican drug dealers. Of course extra special due process is critical for local murderers and rapists and child killers.

Seems to me that a reasonable person might conclude that due process is not about getting to the truth but is a contrived piece of work that attempts to judge if a murderer was fairly investigated and convicted.

The Times begins its attack by convicting the President by saying: "like President Bush’s illegal wiretapping of international calls and e-mail." Truth is that there is no factual account of illegal email snooping while there is debate over the terror-surveillance-program that now is amended. Facts seldom stand in the way of hysterics and never stands in the way of psychotics. You decide which drives that sentence. It gets better.

The Times feels that our courts lack judicial legitimacy because they held that: "Congress could deny inmates of the Guantánamo Bay detention camp the ancient right to challenge their confinement in (federal) court. The 2006 military tribunals law revoked that right for a select group who had been designated “illegal enemy combatants” without a semblance of judicial process." Yes, the ANCIENT RIGHT argument. Remember that one? Actually no, there is no ANCIENT RIGHT argument for spies and illegal combatants. And the lack of a "semblance of judicial process" means that they can't get off due to a technicality.

Fact is that persons that murder while hiding among civilians have for all time been executed ON THE SPOT. And maybe that is the way we should respond too. Hang em high. While uniformed soldiers get some protections, those that murder women and children are defended by the hysterical left as if they are school children dragged from class for just being different. The truth would set these psychos free, but their mental prison is actually the place they aspire to inhabit. Go Figure?