Are Most Journalists Insane?

The election of G.W. Bush after two terms of Billy Clinton seems to have shaken the news media to it's shallow and plastic roots. We've seen over 6 years of dishonesty, exaggeration, hate, envy, and often hysterical, and even psychotic behavior among the liberal media elite. Yes, some activities and some events are open to perceptions or even interpretations, but facts are facts.

I once believed that the poor and uneducated were unable to discern facts from impressions and feelings. We all saw the OJ jury celebrate because they got it right. Yet any person educated beyond the 8th grade knew OJ "done it." Some said that it was easier for the jury to believe in OJ's innocence because she, his now dead ex-wife, "had it cummin." And they felt that African American felons are rousted more than Caucasian felons.

Another example was the arrival of Christopher Columbus in the New World. Historians say that the natives couldn't see the ships when they anchored because they didn't have any idea what ships were. They therefore found new arrivals on their beaches without any idea how that might have happened. And so it is for the liberal media ignorants.

Today, the Washington Post, the less psychotic media outlet among the far left extreme media says again that Joe Wilson went to Niger to explore if Saddam's Iraq "attempted to secure yellow cake uranium from Niger." Today's Post reporters Amy Goldstein and Carol Leonning write: "A few months after the Iraq war began, Wilson publicly criticized President Bush, saying the president had tried to justify the war by including in a State of the Union address "twisted" intelligence from a CIA-sponsored trip to Africa in which Wilson had concluded there was no basis to reports that Iraq had tried to buy uranium to make nuclear weapons from the nation of Niger."

Truth is that the Congressional Committee on Intelligence that reviewed Wilson's report to the CIA on his return, and the CIA have stated unequivocally that: Wilson found evidence that Iraqi "businessmen" had contacted Niger uranium officials to discuss "business relations" which Wilson is quoted as interpreting to mean: "THEY TRIED." Wilson goes on the say that he: "found no real evidence that they succeeded." Further, now that we know that Saddam had bought the French with billions through "Oil for Food and Medicine," it's less likely that the French denied Iraq's request. Why? The French control Niger's uranium.

So with all these facts everywhere in the cyber and real world, why do today's Washington Post reporters repeat the lie? Because they can't see it. They are hysterical over this president's choice to go to war and they MUST tell the people how wrong and illegal and criminal it is. As the women on OJ's jury, these two women strut their stuff believing they see the truth. Fact's don't matter.

The criminal part of this story is that the Post editors KNOW that these women are lying. Yet they too believe that the "company" line must be maintained or the people will again embrace the "dangerous" GW Bush. This is why the special constitutional protections for these loons must be ended today!